[Mark S.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) - adult disabled child's case, young adult claim decision and instead

decision and instead

4)  The ALJ’s finding that “the record does not indicate that a hand-held device is medically required” is not supported by substantial evidence

Remand for an award of benefits – delay

2) The ALJ erred in relying on highly flawed medical expert testimony that conflicted with well established legal standards pertaining to the evaluation of Social Security disability claims

3) The ALJ’s stated reasons for discrediting Plaintiff’s testimony is not based on substantial evidence

[Mark S.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) - adult disabled child's case, young adult claim decision and instead[Mark S.] v. Commr of Soc. Sec., No. 8: 22 CV 785 DNF, 2023 WL 5091355 (M. D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff's Memorandum and Plaintiff's Reply Brief Topics addressed: Adult child's disability benefits Establishing onset Prior claim file RFC failure to include credited opinions RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC interacting with others oung adult claims parents