Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 5 - Aug 10
2) Whether the ALJ’s RFC assessment is supported by substantial evidence
into the RFC assessment are not supported by substantial evidence
RFC – failure to included credited opinion
Merati’s findings are genuinely inconsistent with Dr
3) The ALJ did not properly consider the VA disability rating decision or underlying related evidence
Carlos F. v. O’Malley (S.D. Fla. Mar. 31, 2025) - vestibular impairment, meeting/equalling a listing, definition of medical source, VE/DOT inconsistency 2) Whether the ALJ’s RFCCarlos F. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 23 cv 24563 LOUIS (S. D. Fla. Mar. 31, 2025) (opinion by U. S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Reply Brief, and courts Order Topics addressed: Evaluation of vestibular impairment Listing meeting a listing Listing medical equivalence Definition of a medical source opinion Issues Reserved to the Commissioner RFC failure to address
US$ 35.00
US$ 45.00
US$ 54.00
US$ 14.00
US$ 68.00
US$ 15.00
US$ 68.00
